‘s Act 22, Argentina was the enactment of Act 22, in . 13 “ Multicanal SA y otro s/Denuncia Infracción Ley 22,, ASCJ. 22, () (Ley de Defensa de a Competencia/Competition Defense Act/ CDA) –95, , –13, Arts 1–2. El resto del artículo describe la aplicación de la ley argentina de With the adoption of the provisions of Act 22,, the Argentine antitrust case law began to.
|Published (Last):||22 April 2007|
|PDF File Size:||18.40 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.60 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The above is the complete regulatory plexus that currently controls both anticompetitive conduct and merger and acquisition procedures in Argentina. Investigations of anticompetitive conduct or analyses of mergers and acquisitions made by the CNDC end with a non-binding recommendation to the Secretary of Trade.
According to the legislation of and usual practices in Argentina, the analysis of anticompetitive acts, conduct or behaviours follows a procedure in which, as a first issue, the definition of the scope of the relevant product and geographic market involved in the investigation is highlighted. Section 2 of the Antitrust Law 22226 14 practices that are, to the extent that they fit in any event described in Section 1, anticompetitive.
The most important case in Argentine competition history regarding the abuse key a dominant position involved exploitative conduct, specifically, price discrimination, in the National Commission for the Defence of Competition v.
Business-focused legal analysis and insight in the most significant jurisdictions worldwide Interested in contributing? Defining what relevant markets are according to this analysis is no easy task. The current national government has declared that it intends to modify some of the sections of the Antitrust Law — mainly those regarding thresholds for merger and acquisition notification. Notwithstanding the above-mentioned, it is worth mentioning that a bill of the Antitrust Law is being currently analysed by the Argentine Congress.
We also see evolution and refinement of approaches to competition law enforcement in 26 jurisdictions around the world. The Secretary of Trade has full power to investigate and decide on the existence of anticompetitive conduct, either at the request of a party or ex officio.
Manipulation of benchmark interest rates and foreign exchange trading.
File:Alfonso X noven jpg – Wikimedia Commons
In practice, such criteria may be used as guidelines when determining what shares may enable a company to act independently from its competitors. As mentioned above, the antitrust authorities may enforce conditions aimed at neutralising the distorting aspects of competition or may ask a judge that the offending companies be dissolved, liquidated, unconcentrated or divided.
The Asset Tracing and Recovery Review.
While hugely diverse, it is possible to discern common challenges and similar approaches in very different countries. Complaints must be filed before the antitrust authorities, detailing, among the formal requirements, the complaint subject, the facts that ground the complaint and the legal basis considered for filing the claim. After the evidence is produced, the antitrust authorities must decide the case in 60 days, ending the administrative claim.
In the United States, it is a rare day when newspaper headlines do not announce criminal or regulatory investigations or prosecutions of major financial institutions and other corporations. This sixth edition of The Foreign Investment Regulation Review provides a comprehensive guide to laws, regulations, policies and practices governing foreign investment in key international jurisdictions. The Sports Law Review.
In addition to all the sanctions described above, the individuals or legal entities that are injured by acts and behaviours forbidden by the Antitrust Law may sue for damages in a court of competent jurisdiction in accordance with the laws of Argentina.
Regarding the PRISMA case in which the CNDC stated, as a result of an analysis regarding the credit card and electric payments markets, that the company has a dominant position in some sub marketsin the Secretary of Trade approved the proposal filed by the company.
Further, companies are liable for the acts of their employees even those who are not in a managerial position that are performed on their behalf, for their benefit or with their assistance. Strictly, the abuse of a dominant position can be raised by exploitative or exclusionary conduct, acts or behaviours.
Following this, the antitrust authorities focus mainly on the analysis of market power and market shares of the companies involved in the case. Banking regulation is a never-ending quest to balance the three major policy objectives of financial stability, consumer protection and the needs of developed economies for reliable services involving the provision and intermediation of finance.
It is safe to say that the relative importance of these factors to policymakers will never be constant.
The Antitrust Law provides no guidelines on what market shares give rise to the existence of a dominant position on one or several markets. The Congress is currently analysing a bill with modifications of the Antitrust Law.
It presents the views and observations of leading anti-corruption practitioners in jurisdictions spanning every region of the globe, including new chapters covering Canada, Israel and Korea.
This last decision, regarding a precautionary measure, may be appealed by parties. The Real Estate Law Review. The Virtual Currency Regulation Review. Finally, on 25 AugustAct No.
These 48 cases involved the analysis of claims and investigations leey possible anticompetitive conduct including but not limited to abuse of dominant position.
In the year under review, the antitrust authorities, through the CNDC, opened 12 markets studies and initiated three market investigations.
The following actions or behaviours are prohibited and shall be penalised according to the rulings of this Act: These new chapters, together with updates to the jurisdictions previously covered in the first edition, only serve to emphasise that this is a constantly changing environment.
The Antitrust Law does not ely conducts per se ; conducts must be analysed in all cases by the rule-of-reason criteria, and for sanctioning, the antitrust authorities ely prove an actual or potential damage to the general economic interest.
The Projects and Construction Review. Permission Reusing this file. VI Procedure Abuses of dominant position cases mostly occur through a filing made by any natural or legal person.
File:Alfonso X noven 22262.jpg
You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. Notwithstanding this, an investigation may also be initiated ex officio by the antitrust authorities. The antitrust authorities may enforce precautionary measures, such as ordering leey cessation of the injurious conduct while the analysis of the investigation is taking place.
The Antitrust Law was complemented by Decree No. Export controls and other trade sanctions.
Argentina – The Dominance and Monopolies Review – Edition 6 – The Law Reviews
Finally, any 2262 or terms and conditions that infringe the Antitrust Law may be declared null and void. An understanding of the international framework will provide thoughtful manufacturers and distributors with a strategic advantage in this increasingly competitive area. Editor John P Janka. Welcome to the second edition of The Healthcare Law Review.
La marca de ceca S indica que fue emitida en Sevilla. So ly the replacement on the demand side is effective, consumers must evaluate the products as being able to meet the same needs, under similar consumption opportunities. File File history File usage on Commons Size of this preview: