0. No symptoms at all. 1. No significant disability, despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities. 2. Slight disability; unable to carry out all. Four short, simple measures of arm function, suitable for use with patients recovering from acute stroke, are described. These tests are: the Frenchay Arm Test. Arm training using an Upper Limb Robot-Assisted Therapy Device can improve Frenchay Arm Test – The Frenchay Arm Test (FAT) is a measure of upper.

Author: Faugrel Takazahn
Country: Lesotho
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Finance
Published (Last): 19 October 2006
Pages: 471
PDF File Size: 4.17 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.11 Mb
ISBN: 246-8-81555-402-2
Downloads: 8625
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Yoshicage

To establish validity and reliability of data obtained with the Frenchay Arm Test and compare values with those of other rest function tests. Intraclass correlation coefficients are perhaps more appropriate because they describe agreement of the scores and not just covariation or association. Tests that did not meet the inclusion criteria are listed in Table 2. Please review our privacy policy.

Frenchay Arm test (FAT) – Allie: Abbreviation / Long Form Info.

Hsieh etal, 14 The amount of error that is acceptable will depend on the purpose and specific clinical circumstances surrounding test use, and authors should report reliability relative to these issues. Only English-language articles were requested.

To establish psychometric properties of interrater reliability of disability frencyay impairment scales, to determineconstruct and concurrent validity and responsiveness of data obtained with a test.

Some clinicians may feel that tests of functional limitations that we describe are not as useful as tests of disabilities because the latter more closely relate to activities of grenchay living. The Modified Motor Assessment Chart utilizes subscales of upper- and lower-extremity function and standing leg movements; it is a modified version of the Fugl-Meyer Sensorimotor Assessment.

Restriction or lack of ability to perform an action in the manner or within the range consistent with the purpose of an organ system.

FAT – Frenchay arm test | AcronymAttic

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Thank you for submitting a comment on this article.


A form of measurement validity in which an instrument is used to predict some future performance. Tables in the guide listed investigations in which the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of measurements obtained with frechay tests of function were examined. National Center for Biotechnology InformationU. Evidence supporting the use of upper-extremity motor function outcome measures, therefore, has not been systematically reviewed.

To “verify the interrater reliability and validity” of the Action Research Arm Test in people following a stroke. Standards for tests and measurements in physical therapy practice.

If the PV of a test is established, the clinical utility of that test is improved. However, a study with a large sample size, in general statistical terminology, would have greater power than a study with a smaller sample size, which decreases the likelihood of not correctly identifying a significant relationship.

Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months.

Impairment inventory components included measures of shoulder pain, postural control, and twst upper-extremityhand, leg, and foot function. Int J Rehabil Res. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke.

Nine tests that qualified are described in Table 3. Tests of upper-extremity motor function used for people following a stroke have been described, but reliability and validity psychometric properties of measurements obtained with these tests have not been consistently established.

Therefore, the group that developed the guide characterized ffrenchay research designs as either randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental tewt. Linear correlation coefficients often can overestimate the reliability of data obtained with a test because the relationship between true variance and observed variance ar, be overlooked.

Poole and Whitney described IRR between 2 raters using 24 subjects and Spearman correlation coefficients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Therefore, we placed more emphasis on categorizing the available evidence than on rating its quality. Motricity Index, b Motor Assessment Scale b.

Multiple combinations of test names were used to search for supporting literature as much as possible, but some variants may have been missed. We believe a measurement of motor recovery is difficult to obtain when an uninvolved extremity can compensate for deficits of the involved side. You have entered an invalid code. The absence of psychometric support, however, does not mean that a test has no value. In this frenxhay, the importance of having an assessment fdenchay supported by published accounts of validity and reliability is discussed.


Therefore, these types of tests were excluded. Most tests had 2 properties supported. Sunderland et al, 21 They reported using the Motor Club Assessment to establish grip force as a predictive measure of outcome at 6 months following a stroke, but a secondary finding also was reported when they used the Motor Club Assessment to predict performance on the Frenchay Arm Test.

Inclusion criteria for this review required that the studies reporting psychometric properties had used only subjects who had had a stroke. None of these previously described reviews demonstrated an extensive search for all available upper-extremity motor function tests, and the tests included were not selected based on a set of predetermined inclusion criteria.

The following items comprise the article inclusion criteria: The difference in the degree of relationships between.

Loewen and Anderson, 16 Additional searches were performed using the 31 named tests as key words to be sure that other publications had not been missed in the 2 main literature searches. Interobserver agreement, reliability, and generalizability of data collected in observational studies. Using a modification of Sackett’s procedures Tab.

Therefore, to give credit to tests for which PV was determined, this finding also was reported. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: An instrument evaluation framework: Measurements used to evaluate outcome and performance during and following rehabilitation should have acceptable reliability and validity.

He reported that adequate tests existed and that these tests should be applied under research and clinical circumstances to establish their strengths and weaknesses. To establish validity and reliability among 3 tests: