DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for. DoDAF is the overarching, comprehensive framework and conceptual model enabling Guide: DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense that provides structure.

Author: Gor Tojahn
Country: Lithuania
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 18 August 2012
Pages: 160
PDF File Size: 14.46 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.63 Mb
ISBN: 631-7-91288-526-7
Downloads: 1379
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Maujinn

Product Descriptions” and a “Deskbook”.

Department of Defense Architecture Framework

As one example, the DoDAF v1. Each view depicts certain perspectives of an architecture as described below. The sequence of the artifacts listed below gives a suggested order in which the artifacts could be developed. It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges. One concern about the DoDAF is how well these products meet actual stakeholder concerns for any given system of interest.

It establishes a basis for semantic i.

It provides guidance and suggestions on how to codaf that other proposed methods can be adapted as needed to meet the DoD requirements for dodxf collection and storage. The developing system must not only meet its internal data needs but ddodaf those of the operational framework into which it is set.

DoDAF also serves as the principal guide for development of integrated architectures as defined in DoD Instruction The Views described in DoDAF, including those that are legacy Views from previous versions of the Framework, are provided as pre-defined examples that can be used when developing presentations of architectural data. DoDAF generically dodwf in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques.

It establishes data element definitions, rules, and relationships and a baseline set of products for consistent development of systems, integrated, or federated architectures. In addition, a note on system engineering is included. The three views and their sodaf — driven by common architecture data elements — provide the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, and for measuring the impact of doadf values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness.


For the purposes of architecture development, the doxaf integrated means that data dodad in more than one of the architectural models is commonly defined and understood across those models. DoDAF Conformance ensures reuse of information and that architecture artifacts, models, and viewpoints can be shared with common understanding. DoDAF has a meta-model underpinning the framework, defining the types of modelling elements that can be used in each view and the relationships between them.

In simpler terms, integration is seen in the connection from items common among architecture products, where items shown in one architecture product such as sites used or systems interfaced or services provided should have the identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views. Efficiency – Benefit from improved speed to deploy, optimized resource allocation, improved collaboration and reduced overall cycle times. The repository is defined by the common database schema Core Architecture Data Model 2.

Otherwise there is the risk of producing products with no customers.

Department of Defense Architecture Framework – Wikipedia

The figure represents the information that links the operational view, systems and services view, and technical standards view.

There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required. Systems and services view SV is a set of graphical and textual products that describe systems and services and fodaf providing for, or supporting, DoD functions.

SV products focus on specific physical systems with Retrieved from ” https: While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of dodqf large number of systems architecture frameworks.

As the DM2 .20 to meet the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision makers, architects, and new technologies, it will evolve to a resource that more completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a dodar understandable way, and will enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries.

Clinger-Cohen Act of Each portfolio may be managed using the architectural plans, risk management techniques, capability goals and objectives, and performance measures. Only a subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development.

  DIN 17457 PDF

E-Government Act of fodaf The term integrated means that data required in more than one instance in architectural views is commonly understood across those views. DoDAF generically describes in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques.

Benefits Improved Mission Results – Your team will do a better job of mining available data, measuring and visualizing architecture and overall success dovaf resulting in improved mission results.

The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as systems are procured and fielded to support organizations and their operations.

Government and Defense

However, it should be emphasized that DoDAF is fundamentally about creating a coherent model of the enterprise to enable effective decision-making. The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions. Selecting Architecture Viewpoints carefully ensures that the views adequately frame concerns, e.

Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:. To facilitate the use of information at the data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, tabular, or textual means. Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture.

Program Accountability – Provide Program Manager accountability including the enablement of net-centric processes and architectures, flexibility and responsiveness. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:.

These architecture descriptions may include families of systems FoSsystems of systems SoSand net-centric capabilities for interoperating and interacting in the non-combat environment.