The razing of Melos, and the selling of its inhabitants into slavery, was not a ” Strutture e funzione del dialogo in Tucidide e in PseudoSenofonte”, In , La . El diálogo de los melios es un pasaje perteneciente al Libro V () de la Historia de la Guerra del Peloponeso, escrita por el historiador griego Tucídides. Přečtěte si nejlepší citáty od autora Tucídides. Para el político ateniense homónimo, véase Tucídides. Tucídides fue un h.
|Published (Last):||27 November 2007|
|PDF File Size:||20.57 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.92 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This page was last edited on 14 Mayat On its use in the early atomists see L. Logically and chronologically this first assembly at Sparta should be followed by the convention of the allies and the vote of the Peloponnesian League to go to war, that is by chapters The emphatic parallelism of the infinitive phrases that results from Goodwin’s repunctuation does much to alleviate the harshness of the construction.
Note especially its application to written diplomatic agreements: But now we can also see that part of the technique is to draw the reader in, to awaken our critical and evaluative faculties, and to make the energy of our own response contribute to the power of the text. For the Unitarian there was a single Thucydidean view of each major figure, topic, and undertaking; we had only to be clever enough, or vague enough, to recognize and articulate it.
In BC, with Athens losing the war, the Spartan general Lysander expelled the Athenian settlers from Melos and restored the survivors of the original Dorian colony to the island. The Melians argue that they are a neutral city and not an enemy, so Athens has dialofo need to conquer them. It abjures blandishments, ingratiations, or promises, except the bald statement that Thucydides, even at the beginning of the war, expected that it would be “great and most worth relating of all previous tufidides.
The developments Thucydides describes are not the result of heroes or heroism but of desires that had often been deplored in early literature.
Our attention 30 Note the following parallels between As we shall see in subsequent chapters, all the latter politicians are shown as falling short of the independence and strength of Periclean leadership. It has no place for Golden Ages or great heroes. The excursus is an elaborate ring composition i.
Siege of Melos – Wikipedia
tuciides Not until Mantinea do we hear of an Athenian plan to meet the main force of the Peloponnesians in a hoplite battle. Since it is unlikely that Pericles has approved of the sending of ambassadors, we can infer that he was not in continuous or easy control of the assembly and its moods. The Melians do not change their minds and politely dismiss the envoys.
Smart, “Catalogues in Thucydides and Ephorus,” GRBS 18argues for the deletion of the passage on the grounds that it was interpolated from Ephorus cf.
Even before this they were not swift to go to war unless forced to it. Introduction 9 cordial disapproval of imperial ruthlessness, you fail to see that in the Melian Dialogue, for instance, the folly of the Melians rather than the cruelty of the Athenians is the chief subject of contemplation.
But the change was more than a momentary one, for the Athenians became thereby the leader of one of the two great coalitions in the Greek world, a naval empire ranged against the formidable land power of Sparta and her Peloponnesian League 1. However, texts do not necessarily have to be based on expectations formed by the literature of the past. Both in antiquity and today the readership of the Histories has been cosmopolitan, sophisticated, well-educated, and affluent.
Great Powers naturally imposed their wills; lesser powers accommodated or were crushed. We can call this text “elitist” in a much stricter sense than we can apply that term to the Homeric poems, Greek tragedy, or indeed to almost any archaic or classical Greek poetry.
Autores similares Pericles Dover, appendix 2 to HCT 5, p. Marchant’s introduction to his edition on book 1 [London ] p. Throughout much of the first book political leadership is a rather peripheral issue. Some even encircled themselves with walls since they were now wealthier than they had been” 1.
Note how the themes of the opening sentence are reintroduced and expanded at the end of this unit; A. See 14 Introduction We also know of the reassessment of traditional morality that was taking place in Thucydides’ day.
Hence we approach the next section of the work with a new set of questions in mind. Book 1 49 their cities and strongly suspected of treason. From the point of view of the Spartan command the best hope of victory is somehow to draw the Athenians into a land battle. Trusting he was right in his resolution [gignoskein] not to go out against the enemy, he convened no assembly or other gathering of them lest they come together under the influence of passion rather than reason, and blunder out.
Another possible translation is “men in their prime”. The word was used for historical narrative by Antiochus of Syracuse: It will not be an even trade to ravage part of the Peloponnese and all of Attica, for they will not acquire other territory without a fight, while we have abundant land on the islands and on the mainland.
It says nothing about the widespread rumor that Pericles had bribed King Pleistoanax of Sparta to withdraw his army from Attica. For varying views on the structure see F. Dialogi involves the careful study of details, to be noted also in contemporary Hippocratic medicine and in the techniques of rhetorical instruction developed by the Sophists, who trained their pupils to go through a case point by point assessing what was probable and improbable.
This radically new view of the past can be detected in myth and poetry but often appeared in the prose essays and speeches that can be grouped together as archaiologiai.
The Athenians counter that it is only shameful to submit to an opponent whom one has a reasonable chance of defeating. But it is only well after the Trojan War that the process of “uprooting” abates sufficiently for more general security Some peculiarities of fact and phrasing are indeed evident in the passage, but Smart’s amputation is needlessly severe and posits an interpolator of more than average incompetence.
But I can be dialogp precise about the moment when I began to think about Thucydides in a new way.
They were also inhibited by domestic battles. The Athenians laid siege to the city and withdrew most of their troops from the island to fight elsewhere. Anagke is strong pressure in one direction, not philosophical determinacy or practical inevitability.
Frases de Tucídides
But beyond this, two other aspects are developed in the narrative of the episode. For an interesting investigation of the readership of Herodotus’ work see S. This is an unusual way to say “don’t send another embassy. KatEixe stronglyreinforcesthe second sense.