Instruction (AFI) _IP, Management Of Aviation Critical Safety Items; Air Force Policy. Directive , AFMC Quality Assurance; and. Find the most up-to-date version of AFI at Engineering Additionally, this AF Instruction (AFI) implements the policies in management is contained in AFI , Air Force Acquisition Quality.
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||26 May 2012|
|PDF File Size:||4.12 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.12 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Use lower level requirements generated from the selected alternatives to develop the detailed component design. Monitor the established mechanisms to ensure project data are controlled.
Document the plans, and coordinate with all stakeholders. Version September 78 Version September DG1 The design is based upon a documented architecture, traceable to requirements, and optimized for the set of requirements and constraints DG1P1 Establish and maintain the architectural design baseline Description: The Design process area can best be described by the following goals and practices.
Develop, coordinate and document validation criteria, methods and procedures. Monitor reliability, maintainability, supportability 63-51, as well as that for the other Integrated Logistics Support ILS areas.
Development hardware should be produced using production processes and procedures to the maximum extent possible. Ensure that af baselines established are created from configuration items described within the configuration management system, documented, authorized and released in accordance with CM plans. Develop an event-driven plan that describes the events, significant accomplishments, and accomplishment criteria needed to complete the project tasks described in the work breakdown structure.
Document the description of the alternative avi and the rationale for selection. The acquirer Version September 45 Version 6-3501 is generally responsible for the higher levels, starting with operational requirements, and the suppliers are generally responsible for lower levels.
TO D 01SEP USAF DEFICIENCY REPORTING
Identify and monitor requirements for initial spares, support equipment, facilities and facility modifications. Provide aif of reference for a possible follow-on study to explore the issues and make recommendations required to implement and institutionalize the technical baseline concept, and possibly prototype the concept on a demonstration program for lessons learned.
It also includes the coordination between the various product-component development efforts to refine internal interface specifications.
Ensure the validation strategy addresses the technical approach to demonstrate that user needs are satisfied. These practices include the activities performed by technical professionals across the AF charged with the responsibilities of identifying, acquiring, testing and sustaining military weapon systems. Nevertheless, the Air Force acquisition workforce has eagerly accepted major acquisition challenges.
Page 13 Share Cite.
Define the membership of the configuration control boards. In a succession of builds, the simulated product is constructed, evaluated, improved, and reconstructed based upon knowledge gained in the evaluation process. The SEP should contain references to all technical plans developed for the project e.
Ensure that planned software development effort and schedule is consistent with the overall program budget and development schedule. Additionally, the committee found throughout the study process that many of these concerns appear to continue to plague Air Force acquisition programs today. For example, requirements flow from the stakeholders to the product, segment, sub segment, and eventually to hardware or software component levels.
Maintaining the plan includes changing it as necessary in response to either corrective actions or to changes in requirements and objectives for the process.
DG3P1 Establish and maintain the product integration approach Description: Stakeholders and project management should concur with selected methods. PRR criteria address the evaluation of design maturity, critical manufacturing process capabilities, expected variability, critical spares, product acceptance criteria, tooling, test equipment, personnel, quality controls to ensure conforming products, supplier readiness and capabilities, production cost estimates, and manufacturing risks throughout the supply chain.
Consider how technical data, to include informal data as well as formal project data and plans, will be shared across all relevant stakeholders. The current incremental steps are not achieving the necessary results. Consider 63–501 periodic integrated risk assessments.
Criteria can indicate the readiness of a product-component for integration or its acceptability. Training is designed to take approximately 4 hours. Page 11 Share Cite. Document the final decision with associated rationale and risks.
Looking for other ways to read this?
This is to provide appropriate visibility into the separate practices, and to avoid confusion by the reviewer due to different underlying scoring algorithms. Obtain user concurrence on top level requirements and mission profiles. A generic practice is the description of an activity which is considered important to facilitate successful achievement of the specific practices and process area goals associated with an overarching process area.
Develop criteria, processes and procedures for determination and disposition of nonconforming products to prevent its unintended use or delivery. It focuses on designing the manufacturing processes, tooling and special test equipment at the same time as the product is designed.
Compare Technology Readiness Assessments to user requirements. For manufacturing risks consider the capability of planned production processes to meet anticipated design tolerances. Establish and maintain manufacturing processes. This assessment can also be performed as appropriate for different fai of assembly of components as identified in the integration sequence and available procedures.
Establish technical aspects of a solicitation package that include technical requirements of the acquisition and corresponding proposal evaluation criteria. Record the parameters used to analyze and categorize risks so that they are available throughout the project period for reference when circumstances change over time.
The acquirer is 6-3501 for defining and baselining the requirements levels under its control and also monitoring the suppliers definition of the lower level requirements.
MG3 Manufacture the product in accordance with plans and specifications MG3P1 Ensure that production at desired rates is conducted according to the plan Description: Define thresholds and authorities for controlling resolution of issues subject to a formal evaluation process in the guidelines.
A product is a work product that is delivered to the customer.